"Too many video games promote aggression and violence." How far do you agree?

Model Essay

Video games have become an increasingly prevalent form of entertainment in modern society. However, the argument that video games promote aggression and violence has gained considerable traction in the past few decades. While it is true that some video games contain violent content that may lead to aggression in some individuals, it is important to acknowledge that not all games have this effect, and that multiple factors such as game content, individual susceptibility, and the amount of exposure should be taken into consideration.

The claim that video games promote aggression and violence is supported by research studies that have found a correlation between violent video games and aggression. One such study conducted by Anderson and Dill (2000) found that playing violent video games, even for a short period, can lead to increases in aggressive behavior. The researchers also found that the effect was stronger for male participants. Similarly, a meta-analysis conducted by Ferguson (2015) found that while there was a small correlation between violent video games and aggression, the relationship was stronger for younger children.

Moreover, examples of violent video games that have been criticized for promoting violence exist. The Grand Theft Auto (GTA) series, for example, is infamous for its explicit depictions of violence and criminal behavior. In the game, players assume the role of a criminal and engage in various illegal activities such as theft, murder, and prostitution. Critics argue that such games promote aggressive behavior in individuals by desensitizing them to violence and glamorizing criminal behavior.

Additionally, the video game industry has faced criticism for producing violent content. While many game developers argue that their games are meant for mature audiences, children and teenagers are still exposed to violent content through video games. Game rating systems have been put in place to prevent such exposure, but these systems are not foolproof. For instance, the “Mature” rating assigned to GTA games allows anyone over 17 to purchase the game, excluding minors but still including young adults who may be susceptible to the violent content.

On the other hand, counterarguments against the claim that video games promote aggression and violence also exist. Some research studies have found little to no correlation between violent video games and aggression. For instance, a study conducted by Przybylski et al. (2014) found that playing violent video games did not negatively affect social behavior, empathy, or aggression in teenagers. Similarly, a study conducted by Bean et al. (2016) found no correlation between playing violent video games and aggressive behavior in college students.

Furthermore, non-violent video games can have positive cognitive effects such as promoting cooperation and problem-solving skills. Some popular examples of such games include Minecraft, Portal, and Tetris. These games require players to think creatively and solve problems in order to progress through the game, which can positively affect cognitive development and problem-solving abilities (Granic et al., 2014).

Arguments that individual susceptibility and other factors play a larger role in determining aggression than video game exposure also exist. Not all individuals who play violent video games will exhibit aggressive behavior, suggesting that other factors such as pre-existing mental conditions or external stressors may be at play (Ferguson, 2015). Additionally, the exposure to other forms of media such as movies and television shows, which also contain violent content, may influence aggressive behavior in some individuals.

It is also important to note that the impacts of video games on aggression and violence are complex, and that the debate surrounding the topic is ongoing. Continued research on the topic is necessary to fully understand the relationship between video games and aggressive behavior. However, it is clear that video games have a profound impact on our culture and society, and that they are here to stay. Therefore, we must be diligent in our efforts to understand the potential effects of games on individuals and promote responsible consumption.

One approach to this issue would be for game developers to create more non-violent games that can have positive cognitive and social impacts on individuals. Games that promote problem-solving, cooperation, and creativity could have long-lasting positive effects on individuals and society as a whole. Moreover, game rating systems could be reevaluated to ensure that games with violent content are not being marketed to children or vulnerable populations.

In addition, parents and individuals have a responsibility to monitor and limit game consumption, especially for young children. This is particularly important given the increased prevalence of video games and the potential negative effects of violent content on young, developing minds. By promoting education and media literacy, individuals can make informed decisions about game consumption and become savvy consumers of the medium.

In conclusion, while it is true that some video games can promote aggression and violence, it is important to note that not all games have this effect. Multiple factors such as game content, individual susceptibility, and amount of exposure should be taken into account when examining the relationship between video games and aggression. Therefore, it is crucial to promote responsible game consumption, including monitoring and limiting game consumption for children and vulnerable individuals, promoting education and media literacy, and more regulation of the video game industry to protect individuals from the negative effects of violent content.