With the pressures on today’s young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (eg: physical education and cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Model Essay

Introduction: In the face of academic pressures on young people, there is a debate about whether non-academic subjects, such as physical education and cookery, should be removed from the school syllabus to allow children to concentrate solely on academic subjects. However, I firmly believe that non-academic subjects should not be eliminated, as they provide essential benefits for children’s overall development, including physical health, life skills, and a well-rounded education.

Non-academic subjects offer numerous advantages that contribute to a child’s holistic growth. Physical education classes, for instance, promote physical health and well-being. Engaging in physical activities not only improves fitness levels but also enhances cognitive function, concentration, and overall mental well-being. Regular exercise instills healthy habits that can have lifelong benefits, promoting a balanced and active lifestyle.

Similarly, cookery classes teach practical life skills that are vital for children’s future independence and well-being. Learning to prepare meals equips them with essential knowledge about nutrition, food safety, and meal planning. These skills empower children to make healthier food choices, develop self-sufficiency, and cultivate a sense of creativity and experimentation in the kitchen.

Moreover, non-academic subjects contribute to a well-rounded education. By incorporating physical education, cookery, and other non-academic subjects into the curriculum, schools nurture students’ diverse talents and interests. This approach fosters creativity, encourages self-expression, and instills a love for lifelong learning. Additionally, non-academic subjects provide opportunities for students to develop teamwork, discipline, and resilience, which are transferable skills applicable in various aspects of life.

While the focus on academic subjects is understandable, eliminating non-academic subjects can have negative consequences. Neglecting physical education can result in sedentary lifestyles, obesity, and associated health issues among children. Overemphasizing academic success without nurturing practical life skills may leave students ill-prepared for challenges outside the classroom. A balanced curriculum, encompassing both academic and non-academic subjects, ensures a comprehensive education that caters to the diverse needs and interests of students.

Addressing counterarguments, concerns regarding limited time and resources for academic subjects can be mitigated through efficient time management and curriculum adjustments. Allocating appropriate time for non-academic subjects allows for a balanced approach to education. Additionally, the argument that focusing solely on academic success enhances future career prospects overlooks the fact that non-academic skills, such as teamwork, creativity, and adaptability, are increasingly valued by employers across various professions.

In conclusion, non-academic subjects should remain an integral part of the school curriculum. Physical education and cookery classes, among others, offer invaluable benefits for children’s overall development, including physical health, life skills, and a well-rounded education. A balanced approach to education that combines academic and non-academic subjects prepares students for success not only in their academic pursuits but also in life beyond the classroom.