Outline

Thesis Statement : While sports and athletic facilities are important for a university, spending more money on them than on campus libraries may not be the best allocation of funds.

I. Introduction

  • Explanation of the university’s budget revision
  • Position statement: Not fully supportive of the decision
  • Brief overview of the reasons for the position

II. Importance of sports and athletic facilities

  • Role in student life
  • Attractiveness to prospective students
  • Revenue generation for the university

III. Importance of campus libraries

  • Role in academic success
  • Resources for research and learning
  • Contributions to knowledge and scholarship

IV. Potential negative impacts of spending less on campus libraries

  • Reduced access to resources
  • Decreased quality of education
  • Negative impact on the university’s reputation

V. Alternative solutions

  • Seek out external funding for sports and athletic facilities
  • Prioritize spending based on student and faculty needs
  • Implement cost-saving measures in other areas to free up funds for both sports and libraries.

VI. Conclusion

  • Restate thesis statement
  • Summary of main points
  • Call to action for the university to evaluate budget priorities carefully.

ADVERTISEMENT

Model Essay

The recent decision by a university to allocate more of their budget towards sports and athletic facilities, as opposed to campus libraries, has sparked controversy and debate. While sports and athletic facilities do play an important role in a university, the decision to spend more money on them than on campus libraries may not be the best allocation of funds.

Undoubtedly, sports and athletic facilities are an important part of student life. Apart from providing health benefits, they also promote camaraderie and teamwork. Additionally, they are often used to attract prospective students to the university, which is essential as higher enrollment rates can generate more revenue and help ensure the financial stability of the institution.

On the other hand, libraries are fundamental to academic success. They provide students with essential resources for research and learning, which are essential in the pursuit of knowledge and scholarship. They also allow for access to resources that might not be available online, which is particularly important for students in specific fields such as the sciences.

Unfortunately, the decision to spend less money on campus libraries could have negative consequences. Reduced access to resources could result in decreased quality of education, which could adversely affect the university’s reputation among potential students and faculty. This is particularly problematic in fields where research is a vital component, as a lack of resources could severely limit the ability of students and faculty to produce valuable contributions to their chosen field.

However, alternative solutions exist that could benefit both sports and library resources. For example, seeking out external funding for sports programs and facilities could help ensure that both areas receive the necessary funding. Additionally, prioritizing spending based on student and faculty needs, as opposed to what makes the university look more attractive, could help ensure that both areas receive the necessary funding.

In conclusion, while sports and athletic facilities are an important part of student life, it is not clear that allocating more funding to them than campus libraries is the best approach. Libraries are fundamental to academic success, and reduced funding could harm the university’s reputation and limit access to valuable resources. Alternative solutions, such as external funding or prioritizing spending based on student and faculty needs, could benefit both areas and ultimately help ensure the success of the university.