Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and they do not change their usual habits. Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you prefer? Explain why.

Model Essay

Change is inevitable. It is an essential aspect of human life that is marked by its unpredictability which has both advantages and disadvantages. However, people have different approaches to it. While some enjoy change and new experiences, others prefer to stick to their usual habits. The approach to life one chooses can greatly reflect their personality and preferences. In this essay, I will compare the two approaches and explain why a moderate approach towards change is ideal.

Those who look forward to change and new experiences often reap numerous benefits. Firstly, they have the opportunity to grow and develop personally and professionally. Secondly, they have the chance to acquire new knowledge, skills, experiences, and perspectives, which can be beneficial in their personal and professional lives. Thirdly, they benefit from challenging themselves through new opportunities that arise from change. These benefits are vital in becoming a better version of oneself.

However, wanting change also comes with some risks and disadvantages, including the possibility of failure and disappointment. Change can disrupt established routines and stability, increasing stress and anxiety levels. By their very nature, new experiences often come with an element of uncertainty about the future, which can affect one’s mental well-being. Overall, the advantages of embracing change outweigh the risks and disadvantages associated with it.

On the other hand, sticking to one’s routine and habits can lead to predictability and stability, something that’s desirable for many people, especially those who are not fond of change. It means that they do not have to constantly adjust to new rules or situations, which saves them from stress and anxiety. They are developed patterns that give them security, and they want to keep that as long as possible. The established relationships and routines provide a sense of belonging, in turn, giving them satisfaction.

Nevertheless, the disadvantages of staying the same cannot be ignored. By resisting change, one limits their potential and misses out on opportunities to grow and develop personally and professionally. Furthermore, boredom and unfulfillment are common among people who are set in their ways. Restrictions simply hinder their personal and professional development.

The moderate approach seeks to balance the benefits of stability and novelty. A flexible mindset allows an individual to be open to new experiences, while maintaining their stabilization. Adopting this mindset means that they have the freedom to embrace new opportunities while keeping a sense of comfort and security in their life. A moderate approach is ideal for maximizing personal potential, as it allows for a balance of growth and stability.

In conclusion, while both the ‘changing’ approach and ‘staying the same’ approach of life have their advantages and disadvantages, finding a moderate approach is the ideal one. The benefits of change are numerous, such as growth opportunities and personal development, while the advantages of stability include predictability in one’s life and reduced stress. A flexible mindset allows for an individual to benefit from both approaches, creating a balance that maximizes their potential personally and professionally.